<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 607 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415841</link>
    <description>The court classified surface coating services on new/original goods as job work activity chargeable at 12% under SAC 9988, not manufacturing services at 18%. For old, worn out, or used goods, the services were classified as repairs chargeable at 18% under SAC 9987. The judgment emphasized the distinction between job work and repair services, aligning with relevant tax notifications and legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 607 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415841</link>
      <description>The court classified surface coating services on new/original goods as job work activity chargeable at 12% under SAC 9988, not manufacturing services at 18%. For old, worn out, or used goods, the services were classified as repairs chargeable at 18% under SAC 9987. The judgment emphasized the distinction between job work and repair services, aligning with relevant tax notifications and legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>