<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 604 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415838</link>
    <description>The court directed the assessing officer to pass a speaking order on the objections raised by the petitioner within three weeks, in compliance with the GKN Driveshafts principle. The assessment proceedings were to be kept in abeyance until the speaking order was issued, as per the court&#039;s directive. The writ petition and related miscellaneous petition were disposed of, with no costs awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 604 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415838</link>
      <description>The court directed the assessing officer to pass a speaking order on the objections raised by the petitioner within three weeks, in compliance with the GKN Driveshafts principle. The assessment proceedings were to be kept in abeyance until the speaking order was issued, as per the court&#039;s directive. The writ petition and related miscellaneous petition were disposed of, with no costs awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>