<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 591 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415825</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the additions made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A). The judgment emphasized the incomplete nature of the sale transaction, leading to the deletion of the capital gain addition and allowing the depreciation claimed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 591 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415825</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the additions made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A). The judgment emphasized the incomplete nature of the sale transaction, leading to the deletion of the capital gain addition and allowing the depreciation claimed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>