<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 590 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the contribution to the superannuation fund based on actuarial valuation was allowable under Section 37. However, the provision for leave encashment was not allowable under Section 43B. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to conduct necessary inquiries and verification accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:27:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 590 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the contribution to the superannuation fund based on actuarial valuation was allowable under Section 37. However, the provision for leave encashment was not allowable under Section 43B. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to conduct necessary inquiries and verification accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>