<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 581 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415815</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to claim Cenvat credit on the 2% CVD paid under Customs Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. The interpretation of Rule 3(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 favored the appellants, allowing them to avail the credit for CVD paid under the said notification. Moreover, the demand was considered time-barred as there was no evidence of malafide intention or suppression of facts. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:26:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 581 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415815</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to claim Cenvat credit on the 2% CVD paid under Customs Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. The interpretation of Rule 3(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 favored the appellants, allowing them to avail the credit for CVD paid under the said notification. Moreover, the demand was considered time-barred as there was no evidence of malafide intention or suppression of facts. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>