<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 577 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415811</link>
    <description>For tax periods before 1 October 2015, reassessment under Section 43(1) of the Odisha Value Added Tax Act, 2004 required completion or acceptance of the initial assessment under the relevant self-assessment provisions. The amendment effective from that date introduced reassessment on the basis of information in the assessing authority&#039;s possession and deemed self-assessment, but the change was treated as substantive and prospective, not retrospective. Accordingly, reopening could not be sustained for the pre-amendment period where the initial assessment had not been completed or accepted, and the consequential demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 577 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415811</link>
      <description>For tax periods before 1 October 2015, reassessment under Section 43(1) of the Odisha Value Added Tax Act, 2004 required completion or acceptance of the initial assessment under the relevant self-assessment provisions. The amendment effective from that date introduced reassessment on the basis of information in the assessing authority&#039;s possession and deemed self-assessment, but the change was treated as substantive and prospective, not retrospective. Accordingly, reopening could not be sustained for the pre-amendment period where the initial assessment had not been completed or accepted, and the consequential demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>