<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 794 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299440</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI held that Cenvat credit on GTA services for outward transportation of goods cannot be denied merely because goods are sold on FOR basis. The Tribunal emphasized that the place of removal must be determined by lower authorities to ascertain eligibility for credit, citing precedents in Ultratech Cement Limited and Ispat Industries Limited cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:25:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 794 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299440</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI held that Cenvat credit on GTA services for outward transportation of goods cannot be denied merely because goods are sold on FOR basis. The Tribunal emphasized that the place of removal must be determined by lower authorities to ascertain eligibility for credit, citing precedents in Ultratech Cement Limited and Ispat Industries Limited cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>