https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299446 The High Court dismissed the petition seeking rectification under Section 66 of the KVAT Act for the assessment year 2016-17. The Court held that once a rectified assessment order has been issued, the petitioner's recourse is to file a statutory appeal rather than submitting repeated rectification applications. Despite the petitioner's dissatisfaction with the rectified assessment order, the Court declined to direct a time-bound disposal of the latest rectification application, emphasizing the need for the petitioner to pursue the appropriate legal remedy through a statutory appeal. en-us Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:25:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299446 The High Court dismissed the petition seeking rectification under Section 66 of the KVAT Act for the assessment year 2016-17. The Court held that once a rectified assessment order has been issued, the petitioner's recourse is to file a statutory appeal rather than submitting repeated rectification applications. Despite the petitioner's dissatisfaction with the rectified assessment order, the Court declined to direct a time-bound disposal of the latest rectification application, emphasizing the need for the petitioner to pursue the appropriate legal remedy through a statutory appeal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299446