https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299435 The court dismissed the suit as barred by limitation under Section 3 of the Limitation Act, noting the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged fraud dating back to 1993-1996. The court held that the plaintiff failed to initiate legal action within the prescribed time frame, rendering the suit time-barred. The court also found the plaintiff's attempt to mask the real cause of action as vexatious and meritless, allowing defendant No. 4's application and disposing of all other pending applications accordingly. en-us Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:47:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299435 The court dismissed the suit as barred by limitation under Section 3 of the Limitation Act, noting the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged fraud dating back to 1993-1996. The court held that the plaintiff failed to initiate legal action within the prescribed time frame, rendering the suit time-barred. The court also found the plaintiff's attempt to mask the real cause of action as vexatious and meritless, allowing defendant No. 4's application and disposing of all other pending applications accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299435