https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299434 The court held that an agreement of lease contravening the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 is void and unenforceable. Decrees for ejectment based on such agreements are not permissible. Landlords can recover possession and claim damages for use and occupation but cannot recover rent under a void lease. The judges unanimously concluded on the void nature and unenforceability of the lease agreement. en-us Thu, 20 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:46:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299434 The court held that an agreement of lease contravening the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 is void and unenforceable. Decrees for ejectment based on such agreements are not permissible. Landlords can recover possession and claim damages for use and occupation but cannot recover rent under a void lease. The judges unanimously concluded on the void nature and unenforceability of the lease agreement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299434