<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 1053 - CEGAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299432</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting a company to use accumulated Modvat credit on Additional Excise Duty (AED) towards payment of Basic Excise Duty (BED) or AED on any final product manufactured in their factory. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 57F (12) and previous case law, establishing that AED credit can be utilized for BED payment on final products, ensuring compliance with the rule&#039;s enacting clause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:31:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 1053 - CEGAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299432</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting a company to use accumulated Modvat credit on Additional Excise Duty (AED) towards payment of Basic Excise Duty (BED) or AED on any final product manufactured in their factory. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 57F (12) and previous case law, establishing that AED credit can be utilized for BED payment on final products, ensuring compliance with the rule&#039;s enacting clause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>