<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 732 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299418</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals, finding that the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court determined that the cheques were issued as security for consultancy fees, not towards loan repayment. The complainant&#039;s failure to substantiate the loan disbursement claim and the excessive amounts on the cheques resulted in the complaints being dismissed under Section 138 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 732 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299418</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals, finding that the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court determined that the cheques were issued as security for consultancy fees, not towards loan repayment. The complainant&#039;s failure to substantiate the loan disbursement claim and the excessive amounts on the cheques resulted in the complaints being dismissed under Section 138 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>