<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 550 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the notice issued under Section 153C was invalid as it lacked incriminating material. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and emphasized the necessity of a nexus between seized material and the relevant assessment years, as per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in a related case. The assessment framed without incriminating material was deemed invalid, leading to the annulment of the assessment by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:40:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 550 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the notice issued under Section 153C was invalid as it lacked incriminating material. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and emphasized the necessity of a nexus between seized material and the relevant assessment years, as per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in a related case. The assessment framed without incriminating material was deemed invalid, leading to the annulment of the assessment by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>