<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 35 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27387</link>
    <description>Registered post gives rise to a statutory presumption of due service under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act and Section 114 of the Evidence Act, and that presumption is rebuttable only by credible contrary material. A bare denial does not suffice where the notice was properly despatched, some covers were returned with endorsements of refusal, and the addressee had responded to other statutory notices in the assessment proceedings. Refusal to accept a registered notice amounts to constructive knowledge and valid service. On that basis, the demand notices were treated as duly served, the petitioner was regarded as an assessee in default, and the recovery proceedings were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:10:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 35 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27387</link>
      <description>Registered post gives rise to a statutory presumption of due service under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act and Section 114 of the Evidence Act, and that presumption is rebuttable only by credible contrary material. A bare denial does not suffice where the notice was properly despatched, some covers were returned with endorsements of refusal, and the addressee had responded to other statutory notices in the assessment proceedings. Refusal to accept a registered notice amounts to constructive knowledge and valid service. On that basis, the demand notices were treated as duly served, the petitioner was regarded as an assessee in default, and the recovery proceedings were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>