<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 534 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415768</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The exemption under Section 11 was allowed, advances to members were considered legitimate land payments, and salary payments were deemed reasonable. The Tribunal found the cited case laws inapplicable as transactions were at arm&#039;s length prices and justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:39:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 534 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415768</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The exemption under Section 11 was allowed, advances to members were considered legitimate land payments, and salary payments were deemed reasonable. The Tribunal found the cited case laws inapplicable as transactions were at arm&#039;s length prices and justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>