<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 34 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27386</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court, under Justice Pendse, ruled in favor of the petitioners, a German national and a company, in a case challenging the jurisdictional validity of proceedings initiated under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the Income Tax Officer&#039;s actions in reassessing income for specific assessment years were without jurisdiction as the conditions for exercising such authority were not met. The court also found errors in the application of relevant tax provisions and concluded that the initiation of proceedings for reassessment based on information from the audit department was incorrect. The court quashed the actions of the Income Tax Officer, ruling in favor of the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 34 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27386</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court, under Justice Pendse, ruled in favor of the petitioners, a German national and a company, in a case challenging the jurisdictional validity of proceedings initiated under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the Income Tax Officer&#039;s actions in reassessing income for specific assessment years were without jurisdiction as the conditions for exercising such authority were not met. The court also found errors in the application of relevant tax provisions and concluded that the initiation of proceedings for reassessment based on information from the audit department was incorrect. The court quashed the actions of the Income Tax Officer, ruling in favor of the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>