<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2066 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299403</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the appeal, granting relief on the addition of bogus purchases but dismissing challenges to the validity of re-opening assessment and violation of natural justice. The Tribunal upheld the re-opening of assessment under section 147 of the Act based on tangible post-assessment information indicating income escapement from bogus purchases. Despite the appellant&#039;s attempts to prove the genuineness of purchases, discrepancies in evidence and indications of dubious nature led to the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The appellant&#039;s claims of insufficient opportunity to prove purchases&#039; authenticity were also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2066 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299403</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the appeal, granting relief on the addition of bogus purchases but dismissing challenges to the validity of re-opening assessment and violation of natural justice. The Tribunal upheld the re-opening of assessment under section 147 of the Act based on tangible post-assessment information indicating income escapement from bogus purchases. Despite the appellant&#039;s attempts to prove the genuineness of purchases, discrepancies in evidence and indications of dubious nature led to the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The appellant&#039;s claims of insufficient opportunity to prove purchases&#039; authenticity were also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>