<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1293 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299410</link>
    <description>The SC held that COVID-19 and the lockdown did not amount to a &quot;public emergency&quot; under Section 5 of the Factories Act, because the statutory phrase requires a grave emergency objectively threatening the security of India by war, external aggression, or internal disturbance of comparable gravity. It further held that a blanket exemption from working-hours protections, together with substitution of statutory overtime at double wages by proportionate overtime pay, was inconsistent with the welfare scheme of the Act and workers&#039; constitutional protections. The impugned notifications were therefore quashed, and the statutory overtime entitlement was restored for eligible workers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1293 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299410</link>
      <description>The SC held that COVID-19 and the lockdown did not amount to a &quot;public emergency&quot; under Section 5 of the Factories Act, because the statutory phrase requires a grave emergency objectively threatening the security of India by war, external aggression, or internal disturbance of comparable gravity. It further held that a blanket exemption from working-hours protections, together with substitution of statutory overtime at double wages by proportionate overtime pay, was inconsistent with the welfare scheme of the Act and workers&#039; constitutional protections. The impugned notifications were therefore quashed, and the statutory overtime entitlement was restored for eligible workers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>