<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 809 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299390</link>
    <description>Supreme Court record of a Central Excise special leave petition notes dismissal of the appeal, with no further reasoning or substantive legal principle stated in the text. The document therefore only evidences that the challenge in the excise matter did not proceed further, without setting out any adjudicated issue on duty liability, classification, exemption, or procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 809 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299390</link>
      <description>Supreme Court record of a Central Excise special leave petition notes dismissal of the appeal, with no further reasoning or substantive legal principle stated in the text. The document therefore only evidences that the challenge in the excise matter did not proceed further, without setting out any adjudicated issue on duty liability, classification, exemption, or procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>