<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 518 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415752</link>
    <description>The case addressed various issues including setoff of losses of STP/SEZ units, nature of payment for software purchase, disallowance of depreciation, allocation of corporate office expenses, inclusion of profits from overseas facilities, eligibility of incomes for exemption under Section 10A, and determination of export turnover. The High Court&#039;s decisions on these matters were challenged, emphasizing the need for clarity and consistency in tax law interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 518 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415752</link>
      <description>The case addressed various issues including setoff of losses of STP/SEZ units, nature of payment for software purchase, disallowance of depreciation, allocation of corporate office expenses, inclusion of profits from overseas facilities, eligibility of incomes for exemption under Section 10A, and determination of export turnover. The High Court&#039;s decisions on these matters were challenged, emphasizing the need for clarity and consistency in tax law interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>