https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299382 After the amendment to Order VI Rule 15(4) CPC, statements recorded under Order X must be supported on oath, displacing the earlier view that they were not evidentiary in nature. The text also states that legal representatives cannot avoid examination under Order X, because refusal to appear is met by the procedural consequence expressly provided in Order X Rule 4(2). On the rental issue, a prima facie finding that the defendant had no subsisting right, title or interest in the property justified securing the rental income in Court, with liberty to seek reimbursement of expenses and taxes. en-us Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:34:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299382 After the amendment to Order VI Rule 15(4) CPC, statements recorded under Order X must be supported on oath, displacing the earlier view that they were not evidentiary in nature. The text also states that legal representatives cannot avoid examination under Order X, because refusal to appear is met by the procedural consequence expressly provided in Order X Rule 4(2). On the rental issue, a prima facie finding that the defendant had no subsisting right, title or interest in the property justified securing the rental income in Court, with liberty to seek reimbursement of expenses and taxes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299382