<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 1053 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299374</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no valid ground to admit the Central Excise appeal and dismissed it. The operative effect is that the challenge did not proceed further on admission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 1053 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299374</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no valid ground to admit the Central Excise appeal and dismissed it. The operative effect is that the challenge did not proceed further on admission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>