https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299373 Section 63 of the Indian Contract Act allows a promisee to remit performance or accept substituted satisfaction, and the surrounding correspondence and conduct supported an inference that the plaintiff had been willing to take compensation instead of insisting on performance. The plaintiff's withholding of the covering letter justified an adverse inference, weakening the claim to specific performance. Under Sections 12 and 21(a) of the Specific Relief Act, specific performance is unavailable where pecuniary compensation is adequate, and the plaintiff's own willingness to accept damages showed that money relief could sufficiently redress the loss. The stated principle is that accepted or willing substitution by compensation, together with adequate monetary remedy, bars specific performance. en-us Tue, 23 Nov 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:26:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299373 Section 63 of the Indian Contract Act allows a promisee to remit performance or accept substituted satisfaction, and the surrounding correspondence and conduct supported an inference that the plaintiff had been willing to take compensation instead of insisting on performance. The plaintiff's withholding of the covering letter justified an adverse inference, weakening the claim to specific performance. Under Sections 12 and 21(a) of the Specific Relief Act, specific performance is unavailable where pecuniary compensation is adequate, and the plaintiff's own willingness to accept damages showed that money relief could sufficiently redress the loss. The stated principle is that accepted or willing substitution by compensation, together with adequate monetary remedy, bars specific performance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Nov 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299373