https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415666 The court dismissed the petition challenging the summon issued under Section 61 of Cr.P.C., holding that the Special Judge can take cognizance without registering an FIR under the PMLA. Additionally, the court ruled that the adjudicating authority's finding on provisional attachment of property does not bar prosecution for money-laundering. The petitioner's claim of no connection with the accused company was rejected, and the court directed the trial court to proceed with the complaint promptly. en-us Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Dec 2021 09:25:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415666 The court dismissed the petition challenging the summon issued under Section 61 of Cr.P.C., holding that the Special Judge can take cognizance without registering an FIR under the PMLA. Additionally, the court ruled that the adjudicating authority's finding on provisional attachment of property does not bar prosecution for money-laundering. The petitioner's claim of no connection with the accused company was rejected, and the court directed the trial court to proceed with the complaint promptly. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415666