<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1280 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299367</link>
    <description>Lawful tenants of sealed premises were entitled to unsealing and release where they were not shown as accused, the police report stated they had no role in the offence, and the premises had been given to the accused company only on an ex-gratis basis. Handing the property directly to the landlord&#039;s successor without recourse to rent law and the ordinary eviction process would have amounted to dispossession without due process. Completion of investigation and filing of the charge-sheet further supported release of the premises. The refusal to unseal and release the premises was therefore unsustainable, and the premises were directed to be unsealed and handed over to the tenants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2021 09:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1280 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299367</link>
      <description>Lawful tenants of sealed premises were entitled to unsealing and release where they were not shown as accused, the police report stated they had no role in the offence, and the premises had been given to the accused company only on an ex-gratis basis. Handing the property directly to the landlord&#039;s successor without recourse to rent law and the ordinary eviction process would have amounted to dispossession without due process. Completion of investigation and filing of the charge-sheet further supported release of the premises. The refusal to unseal and release the premises was therefore unsustainable, and the premises were directed to be unsealed and handed over to the tenants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>