<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27360</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the withdrawals made by the assessee from M/s. Universal Radiators Private Limited were from the company&#039;s funds, not from an individual&#039;s credit, as entries were made only at the end of the accounting year. The Court determined that the excess withdrawals should be treated as loans or advances under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, ruling against the assessee and awarding costs to the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27360</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the withdrawals made by the assessee from M/s. Universal Radiators Private Limited were from the company&#039;s funds, not from an individual&#039;s credit, as entries were made only at the end of the accounting year. The Court determined that the excess withdrawals should be treated as loans or advances under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, ruling against the assessee and awarding costs to the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>