<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 522 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299350</link>
    <description>Withholding of three increments with cumulative effect is treated as a minor penalty under the applicable service rules, not a major penalty. Even where only a minor penalty is proposed, the delinquent employee must be given an opportunity to explain the charges, and if the allegations are factual and are denied, a departmental enquiry is required. These requirements form the minimum content of natural justice and cannot be dispensed with. The matter was remitted for reconsideration of whether the employee had been afforded a proper defence opportunity and, if an enquiry was necessary, whether it was conducted in accordance with law and natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 522 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299350</link>
      <description>Withholding of three increments with cumulative effect is treated as a minor penalty under the applicable service rules, not a major penalty. Even where only a minor penalty is proposed, the delinquent employee must be given an opportunity to explain the charges, and if the allegations are factual and are denied, a departmental enquiry is required. These requirements form the minimum content of natural justice and cannot be dispensed with. The matter was remitted for reconsideration of whether the employee had been afforded a proper defence opportunity and, if an enquiry was necessary, whether it was conducted in accordance with law and natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>