https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299345 A partition suit was held within time because limitation ran from a clear threat to the asserted right, and bona fide prior injunction proceedings allowed exclusion of that period. The adoption deed was treated as an adoption deed, not a testamentary disposition, so the adopted coparcener's rights in joint family property were preserved. The evidence did not support invalidity of Bimla Devi's marriage. On title, assets traceable to a sufficient joint family nucleus were treated as joint property, while the Shalimar Garden and Mehrauli plots remained self-acquired. The partition decree was maintained with only the shares revised to 1/7th each. en-us Mon, 24 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:54:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299345 A partition suit was held within time because limitation ran from a clear threat to the asserted right, and bona fide prior injunction proceedings allowed exclusion of that period. The adoption deed was treated as an adoption deed, not a testamentary disposition, so the adopted coparcener's rights in joint family property were preserved. The evidence did not support invalidity of Bimla Devi's marriage. On title, assets traceable to a sufficient joint family nucleus were treated as joint property, while the Shalimar Garden and Mehrauli plots remained self-acquired. The partition decree was maintained with only the shares revised to 1/7th each. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299345