https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299344 The court dismissed the suit filed for partition and possession of a property in New Delhi, as Defendant No.1's application under Order VII Rule 11 A & D of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint was upheld. The court found that the suit property was held benami by Defendant No.1, and the Plaintiff's claim as the real owner was barred under Section 4(1) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The suit was dismissed, and each party was ordered to bear their respective costs. en-us Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:42:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299344 The court dismissed the suit filed for partition and possession of a property in New Delhi, as Defendant No.1's application under Order VII Rule 11 A & D of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint was upheld. The court found that the suit property was held benami by Defendant No.1, and the Plaintiff's claim as the real owner was barred under Section 4(1) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The suit was dismissed, and each party was ordered to bear their respective costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299344