<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1371 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299341</link>
    <description>Property standing in a female Hindu&#039;s name was not shown to have any independent or joint family source, so the presumption of joint family ownership was not sustained. Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act was applied to recognise full ownership in property possessed by a female Hindu, with overriding effect over earlier limited-ownership notions. On the facts recorded, the assets could not be treated as joint family property, and the contrary finding was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:33:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1371 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299341</link>
      <description>Property standing in a female Hindu&#039;s name was not shown to have any independent or joint family source, so the presumption of joint family ownership was not sustained. Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act was applied to recognise full ownership in property possessed by a female Hindu, with overriding effect over earlier limited-ownership notions. On the facts recorded, the assets could not be treated as joint family property, and the contrary finding was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>