https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299342 Partition plaints that directly deny a non-coparcener's title to property alleged to belong to the joint family require adjudication of title and attract ad valorem court-fee on the disputed property's market value; they cannot proceed as simple partition claims. Claims asserting that property standing in a coparcener's wife's name is benami are barred where the transaction does not fall within the statutory protection for such holdings. The prohibition on enforcing a real owner's rights in benami property applies to pending proceedings. Partition entitlement may nevertheless continue for properties not affected by the title challenge or benami bar. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:33:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299342 Partition plaints that directly deny a non-coparcener's title to property alleged to belong to the joint family require adjudication of title and attract ad valorem court-fee on the disputed property's market value; they cannot proceed as simple partition claims. Claims asserting that property standing in a coparcener's wife's name is benami are barred where the transaction does not fall within the statutory protection for such holdings. The prohibition on enforcing a real owner's rights in benami property applies to pending proceedings. Partition entitlement may nevertheless continue for properties not affected by the title challenge or benami bar. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299342