<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 409 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415643</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the appeal, with substantial questions (a) to (c) decided in favor of the Revenue and questions (d) and (e) in favor of the assessee. The court upheld the classification of income as house property, disallowed the provision for commission payment, rejected treating interest component in foreign exchange gain as revenue, and allowed the deduction for unrealized foreign exchange capital gain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 409 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415643</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the appeal, with substantial questions (a) to (c) decided in favor of the Revenue and questions (d) and (e) in favor of the assessee. The court upheld the classification of income as house property, disallowed the provision for commission payment, rejected treating interest component in foreign exchange gain as revenue, and allowed the deduction for unrealized foreign exchange capital gain.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>