<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 20 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27352</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Income Tax Officer&#039;s decision to reopen the assessment under Section 147(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the assessee&#039;s non-disclosure of material facts regarding the true cost of construction of properties. The Tribunal found that the reassessment order was justified, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument that there was no overt act of concealment. The court held that the Income Tax Officer had sufficient reason to believe that income had escaped assessment, affirming the validity of the reassessment under Section 147(a). The assessee was directed to pay the costs of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 20 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27352</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Income Tax Officer&#039;s decision to reopen the assessment under Section 147(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the assessee&#039;s non-disclosure of material facts regarding the true cost of construction of properties. The Tribunal found that the reassessment order was justified, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument that there was no overt act of concealment. The court held that the Income Tax Officer had sufficient reason to believe that income had escaped assessment, affirming the validity of the reassessment under Section 147(a). The assessee was directed to pay the costs of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>