<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1299 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299321</link>
    <description>The ruling determined that the nature of the supply in the case was classified as &#039;Supply of Goods&#039; rather than &#039;Supply of Service&#039;. The correct HSN code for the supply was identified as 7309, with an applicable GST rate of 18%. As a result, Circular No. 126/45/2019-GST was deemed not applicable. The ruling is valid within the jurisdiction of the Authority for Advance Ruling Uttar Pradesh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1299 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299321</link>
      <description>The ruling determined that the nature of the supply in the case was classified as &#039;Supply of Goods&#039; rather than &#039;Supply of Service&#039;. The correct HSN code for the supply was identified as 7309, with an applicable GST rate of 18%. As a result, Circular No. 126/45/2019-GST was deemed not applicable. The ruling is valid within the jurisdiction of the Authority for Advance Ruling Uttar Pradesh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>