https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299325 A monetary transaction with partial repayment and documents executed toward discharge of liability did not, on the materials described, show dishonest inducement or intention at inception. The allegations therefore did not satisfy cheating or criminal breach of trust, and the dispute was treated as a civil money claim rather than offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. The alleged intimidation was also described as vague, bald, and improbable, so it did not amount to criminal intimidation under Section 506(ii) IPC. On that basis, the criminal process was treated as an abuse in a matter essentially arising out of a civil loan dispute, and the FIR was quashed. en-us Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:34:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299325 A monetary transaction with partial repayment and documents executed toward discharge of liability did not, on the materials described, show dishonest inducement or intention at inception. The allegations therefore did not satisfy cheating or criminal breach of trust, and the dispute was treated as a civil money claim rather than offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. The alleged intimidation was also described as vague, bald, and improbable, so it did not amount to criminal intimidation under Section 506(ii) IPC. On that basis, the criminal process was treated as an abuse in a matter essentially arising out of a civil loan dispute, and the FIR was quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299325