<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2030 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299332</link>
    <description>A short inadvertent delay in payment of the balance amount under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 was treated as genuine and capable of condonation where the required amount, with interest at 12% per annum, had already been deposited. On those facts, the Supreme Court accepted that the brief delay should not defeat compliance and directed acceptance of the deposit with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:34:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2030 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299332</link>
      <description>A short inadvertent delay in payment of the balance amount under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 was treated as genuine and capable of condonation where the required amount, with interest at 12% per annum, had already been deposited. On those facts, the Supreme Court accepted that the brief delay should not defeat compliance and directed acceptance of the deposit with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>