<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1151 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299307</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal against the order of acquittal in a cheque dishonour case. The court found that the accused failed to disprove the issuance of the cheque and related documents, despite claiming coercion. Previous financial transactions between the parties supported the complainant&#039;s case. The accused&#039;s actions were deemed insufficient to prove the absence of a transaction. Consequently, the accused was convicted, ordered to pay Rs. 4 lakhs as compensation within four months, with default consequences of imprisonment and a fine. Additionally, a fine of Rs. 5,000 to the state was imposed, with default consequences of imprisonment for 15 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 15:30:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1151 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299307</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal against the order of acquittal in a cheque dishonour case. The court found that the accused failed to disprove the issuance of the cheque and related documents, despite claiming coercion. Previous financial transactions between the parties supported the complainant&#039;s case. The accused&#039;s actions were deemed insufficient to prove the absence of a transaction. Consequently, the accused was convicted, ordered to pay Rs. 4 lakhs as compensation within four months, with default consequences of imprisonment and a fine. Additionally, a fine of Rs. 5,000 to the state was imposed, with default consequences of imprisonment for 15 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>