<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 358 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415592</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling that Rule 7 of the Valuation Rules, 2000, is not applicable when goods are also sold at the factory gate to unrelated buyers. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the demand was quashed. Other issues raised by the appellants were not examined in detail as the primary finding on Rule 7&#039;s inapplicability was determinative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 358 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415592</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling that Rule 7 of the Valuation Rules, 2000, is not applicable when goods are also sold at the factory gate to unrelated buyers. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the demand was quashed. Other issues raised by the appellants were not examined in detail as the primary finding on Rule 7&#039;s inapplicability was determinative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>