https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415562 The accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, with the Trial Court's decision upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge. The accused's defense regarding the landlord-tenant relationship and misuse of cheques was not substantiated, and their attempts to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Act were unsuccessful. The Court found the evidence presented by the prosecution more compelling, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the conviction and sentence. The compliance with the Tamil Nadu Money Lenders Act, 1957, was also considered in the decision to dismiss the Criminal Revision Case. en-us Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:34:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415562 The accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, with the Trial Court's decision upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge. The accused's defense regarding the landlord-tenant relationship and misuse of cheques was not substantiated, and their attempts to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Act were unsuccessful. The Court found the evidence presented by the prosecution more compelling, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the conviction and sentence. The compliance with the Tamil Nadu Money Lenders Act, 1957, was also considered in the decision to dismiss the Criminal Revision Case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415562