<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1660 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299278</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 was time-barred, as the limitation period should start from the date of intimation under Section 143(1). Furthermore, the corpus donations were considered voluntary and capital in nature, meeting the criteria for exemption under Section 11(1)(d). Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful, and the order under Section 263 was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:50:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1660 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299278</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 was time-barred, as the limitation period should start from the date of intimation under Section 143(1). Furthermore, the corpus donations were considered voluntary and capital in nature, meeting the criteria for exemption under Section 11(1)(d). Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful, and the order under Section 263 was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>