https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299285 On the pleadings and documents, the Court found a prima facie case of trademark infringement and held that continued use of a deceptively similar mark and logo would risk ongoing harm pending trial. Interim restraint was granted against use of the PUMA mark, any deceptively similar trademark, and the Form Strip Logo on the defendants' products. To preserve evidence and secure an account of the allegedly infringing activity, the Court also appointed local commissioners to inspect the identified premises, inventory infringing goods and packing material, and record relevant stock, production, sales and account records. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:50:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299285 On the pleadings and documents, the Court found a prima facie case of trademark infringement and held that continued use of a deceptively similar mark and logo would risk ongoing harm pending trial. Interim restraint was granted against use of the PUMA mark, any deceptively similar trademark, and the Form Strip Logo on the defendants' products. To preserve evidence and secure an account of the allegedly infringing activity, the Court also appointed local commissioners to inspect the identified premises, inventory infringing goods and packing material, and record relevant stock, production, sales and account records. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299285