https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299289 The tribunal dismissed IA No. 169/JPR/2019, ruling that the applicant's claim was properly categorized as operational debt by the RP. The tribunal also rejected IA No. 202/JPR/2019, IA No. 205/JPR/2019, and IA No. 212/JPR/2019, deeming them similar to IA No. 169/JPR/2019. Citing a prior decision in IA No. 135/JPR/2019, the tribunal found that the applicant's claim did not fulfill the requirements for financial debt under the I&B Code. en-us Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:50:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299289 The tribunal dismissed IA No. 169/JPR/2019, ruling that the applicant's claim was properly categorized as operational debt by the RP. The tribunal also rejected IA No. 202/JPR/2019, IA No. 205/JPR/2019, and IA No. 212/JPR/2019, deeming them similar to IA No. 169/JPR/2019. Citing a prior decision in IA No. 135/JPR/2019, the tribunal found that the applicant's claim did not fulfill the requirements for financial debt under the I&B Code. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299289