<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27334</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the tax case petition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the deduction for an accrued liability towards an approved gratuity fund was not allowable under section 40(A)(7) as no provision for contribution was made in the accounts. The court emphasized the requirement to make provisions for liabilities in a timely manner and adhere to the specific provisions of the Income Tax Act to claim deductions related to gratuity funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:57:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27334</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the tax case petition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the deduction for an accrued liability towards an approved gratuity fund was not allowable under section 40(A)(7) as no provision for contribution was made in the accounts. The court emphasized the requirement to make provisions for liabilities in a timely manner and adhere to the specific provisions of the Income Tax Act to claim deductions related to gratuity funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>