<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (2) TMI 110 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299262</link>
    <description>Under Article 164 of the Limitation Act, 1908, time for an Order IX Rule 13 application runs only when the applicant has knowledge of the specific ex parte decree sought to be set aside, not from vague notice that some decree exists. The relevant test is whether the information, viewed with the surrounding facts, gave clear awareness of the decree and the resulting injury so that effective challenge was possible. On the facts, personal information about the decree, the connected suits, and the parties&#039; dealings was sufficient to impute knowledge of the particular decree, so the application filed later was time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 15:23:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (2) TMI 110 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299262</link>
      <description>Under Article 164 of the Limitation Act, 1908, time for an Order IX Rule 13 application runs only when the applicant has knowledge of the specific ex parte decree sought to be set aside, not from vague notice that some decree exists. The relevant test is whether the information, viewed with the surrounding facts, gave clear awareness of the decree and the resulting injury so that effective challenge was possible. On the facts, personal information about the decree, the connected suits, and the parties&#039; dealings was sufficient to impute knowledge of the particular decree, so the application filed later was time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>