https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299251 A challenge to an eviction decree by an alleged legal heir could not be summarily rejected where parentage, representation and collusion were disputed; those factual questions required evidence, so the objection had to be remitted for fresh decision. The document also states that where legal heirs already parties to the eviction case genuinely and bona fide represented the family interest, the decree binds non-impleaded heirs as well. On the connected facts, the record supported adequate representation, and the non-impleaded heirs' challenge failed. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Dec 2021 12:34:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299251 A challenge to an eviction decree by an alleged legal heir could not be summarily rejected where parentage, representation and collusion were disputed; those factual questions required evidence, so the objection had to be remitted for fresh decision. The document also states that where legal heirs already parties to the eviction case genuinely and bona fide represented the family interest, the decree binds non-impleaded heirs as well. On the connected facts, the record supported adequate representation, and the non-impleaded heirs' challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299251