<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 324 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415558</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay the disputed tax and 50% of the proposed penalty within two weeks, following which the goods vehicle would be released. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue remedies before the Appellate Commissioner under the CGST Act, 2017 and TNGST Act, 2017. The case was disposed of without costs, and the related Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 324 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415558</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay the disputed tax and 50% of the proposed penalty within two weeks, following which the goods vehicle would be released. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue remedies before the Appellate Commissioner under the CGST Act, 2017 and TNGST Act, 2017. The case was disposed of without costs, and the related Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>