https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415557 The court disposed of the writ petition, emphasizing the petitioner's obligation to comply with the G.S.T. Act's provisions for the release of seized goods. The petitioner's claim of facing starvation due to the seizure was deemed insufficient without fulfilling legal requirements, such as proving ownership and submitting necessary documents. The court directed the petitioner to follow the prescribed procedures under Section 129 of the G.S.T. Act 2017, including submitting the required form for consideration by the authorities. Compliance with statutory requirements and providing specific documentation for ownership were highlighted as essential for the release of seized goods. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415557 The court disposed of the writ petition, emphasizing the petitioner's obligation to comply with the G.S.T. Act's provisions for the release of seized goods. The petitioner's claim of facing starvation due to the seizure was deemed insufficient without fulfilling legal requirements, such as proving ownership and submitting necessary documents. The court directed the petitioner to follow the prescribed procedures under Section 129 of the G.S.T. Act 2017, including submitting the required form for consideration by the authorities. Compliance with statutory requirements and providing specific documentation for ownership were highlighted as essential for the release of seized goods. Case-Laws GST Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415557