<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 310 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various grounds, including the invalidity of reassessment proceedings, improper addition under Section 68, violation of natural justice, mechanical approval by the CIT, and non-compliance with the four-week waiting period. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and instructed the AO to remove the addition, ultimately granting relief to the assessee by allowing their appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 310 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various grounds, including the invalidity of reassessment proceedings, improper addition under Section 68, violation of natural justice, mechanical approval by the CIT, and non-compliance with the four-week waiting period. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and instructed the AO to remove the addition, ultimately granting relief to the assessee by allowing their appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>