<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 303 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that the liability to sundry creditors had not ceased to exist. The assessee provided evidence of payments and non-cessation of the liability, leading to the provisions of section 41(1) not being applicable. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the relief granted to the assessee by the ld. CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 303 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that the liability to sundry creditors had not ceased to exist. The assessee provided evidence of payments and non-cessation of the liability, leading to the provisions of section 41(1) not being applicable. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the relief granted to the assessee by the ld. CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>