<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 292 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415526</link>
    <description>Clear float glass imported as 3.8 mm thickness, with measured thickness between 3.73 mm and 3.86 mm, was held not to fall within the anti-dumping duty notification covering goods of 4 mm to 12 mm. The notification was construed strictly, and BIS tolerance could not be selectively applied to enlarge duty liability where the actual goods remained below the notified range. The extended period of limitation was also found unavailable because the goods were duly declared in the bills of entry, examined by customs, and cleared without any misdeclaration, suppression, or wilful misstatement. The anti-dumping duty demand was accordingly set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 08:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 292 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415526</link>
      <description>Clear float glass imported as 3.8 mm thickness, with measured thickness between 3.73 mm and 3.86 mm, was held not to fall within the anti-dumping duty notification covering goods of 4 mm to 12 mm. The notification was construed strictly, and BIS tolerance could not be selectively applied to enlarge duty liability where the actual goods remained below the notified range. The extended period of limitation was also found unavailable because the goods were duly declared in the bills of entry, examined by customs, and cleared without any misdeclaration, suppression, or wilful misstatement. The anti-dumping duty demand was accordingly set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>